Comments on: Is The GPU Holding The PS3 Back? Short Answer, NO http://www.gamersworldbd.com/2008/06/is-the-gpu-holding-the-ps3-back-short-answer-no.html Video Game News, Analysis, Opinion, Current Trends Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:21:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Reza http://www.gamersworldbd.com/2008/06/is-the-gpu-holding-the-ps3-back-short-answer-no.html/comment-page-1#comment-13536 Reza Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:33:11 +0000 http://www.gamersworldbd.com/2008/06/is-the-gpu-holding-the-ps3-back-short-answer-no.html#comment-13536 Hmmm, couple of weeks ago I had fight with a person who was defending PS 3 under the blame for the developers. Things is (I own both) when a gamer buys a game for his console, *he plays it on THAT CONSOLE, not on the developers ass* :razz: :razz: :razz: :razz: Whatever the reason the guilt or the victim is the console. I do not look into too deep what the developers have done, I just sense -it is my console. Having been playing with this two consoles, I should say both has its own pros and cons. The X 3 has EDID feature, no matter what type of display you have (be it VGA, or DVI-D, HDMI) the X3 immediately detects it, and adjusts to that optimal resolution. PS 3 somehow lacks it. I connect my PS 3 to my monitor's DVI-D and it sense it as an HDMI- what the heck. I connect the X3 and it immediately recognizes it is a DVI-D. Again, recent gamespot graphics comparison of A C II proved AC II had better (sharper) textures on X 3 than on PS 3. If its the developers fault, then WHY THE HECK they still sucks at porting properly Cross platformers to the PS 3s EVEN after 3/4 years of its releases dudes? Again peep come here and blame the developers defending the PS 3. From my personal experience (I have 32" HD TV, and a 19 inch DVI-D, VGA Capable LCD monitor), I think PS 3 suffers from *slight* jaggedness and less textures than the X3. Those phenomenas were occured when played UC II, Resistance, Infamous. The PS 3's main POWER is it's Hardware (CPU) potential- heavy rain, killzone 2, and heavenly sword are the examples. Only drawback I found for ma X 3 is its bulkier gamepad, heavy sound when the game is not installed. PS 3's gamepad way smooth, smart and light and it does not fart much like the X3. :razz: Hmmm, couple of weeks ago I had fight with a person who was defending PS 3 under the blame for the developers.

Things is (I own both) when a gamer buys a game for his console, *he plays it on THAT CONSOLE, not on the developers ass* :razz: :razz: :razz: :razz:

Whatever the reason the guilt or the victim is the console. I do not look into too deep what the developers have done, I just sense -it is my console.

Having been playing with this two consoles, I should say both has its own pros and cons.

The X 3 has EDID feature, no matter what type of display you have (be it VGA, or DVI-D, HDMI) the X3 immediately detects it, and adjusts to that optimal resolution. PS 3 somehow lacks it. I connect my PS 3 to my monitor’s DVI-D and it sense it as an HDMI- what the heck. I connect the X3 and it immediately recognizes it is a DVI-D.

Again, recent gamespot graphics comparison of A C II proved AC II had better (sharper) textures on X 3 than on PS 3.

If its the developers fault, then WHY THE HECK they still sucks at porting properly Cross platformers to the PS 3s EVEN after 3/4 years of its releases dudes?

Again peep come here and blame the developers defending the PS 3.

From my personal experience (I have 32″ HD TV, and a 19 inch DVI-D, VGA Capable LCD monitor), I think PS 3 suffers from *slight* jaggedness and less textures than the X3.

Those phenomenas were occured when played UC II, Resistance, Infamous.

The PS 3′s main POWER is it’s Hardware (CPU) potential- heavy rain, killzone 2, and heavenly sword are the examples.

Only drawback I found for ma X 3 is its bulkier gamepad, heavy sound when the game is not installed. PS 3′s gamepad way smooth, smart and light and it does not fart much like the X3. :razz:

]]> By: James http://www.gamersworldbd.com/2008/06/is-the-gpu-holding-the-ps3-back-short-answer-no.html/comment-page-1#comment-11465 James Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:14:34 +0000 http://www.gamersworldbd.com/2008/06/is-the-gpu-holding-the-ps3-back-short-answer-no.html#comment-11465 @ farhan - id love to see the link to that quote u just cooked up out of ur fanboy ass. as for the rsx. the recent games are proof enough. Batman Arkham Asylum performs better on the ps3. oblivion has better all around graphics on the ps3. bioshock has better graphics on the ps3. and mostly all other games run the same. I remember Assassins creed which has better contrast of lighting but more jittery framerates than the 360. dragon age origins got .5 rating more for the ps3 simply because graphics are so much better on it.And not to mention MGS 4 is still the best technical showcare there is on any platform. The graphics quality of ps3 exclusives are far better than 360 ones. uncharted 1 and 2 . kz 2. mgs 4. heavenly sword. motorstorms. valkyria chronicles. Its rather that the 360 is easier to dev for because its architecture and design is similar to a pc is the reason 360 has better looking games and not all devs put the same effort in for the ps3 versions.. thats where the difference lies. so if anything is wrong with the ps3 .. its lack of dev kits and user friendlyness for devs. @ farhan – id love to see the link to that quote u just cooked up out of ur fanboy ass. as for the rsx. the recent games are proof enough. Batman Arkham Asylum performs better on the ps3. oblivion has better all around graphics on the ps3. bioshock has better graphics on the ps3. and mostly all other games run the same. I remember Assassins creed which has better contrast of lighting but more jittery framerates than the 360. dragon age origins got .5 rating more for the ps3 simply because graphics are so much better on it.And not to mention MGS 4 is still the best technical showcare there is on any platform. The graphics quality of ps3 exclusives are far better than 360 ones. uncharted 1 and 2 . kz 2. mgs 4. heavenly sword. motorstorms. valkyria chronicles. Its rather that the 360 is easier to dev for because its architecture and design is similar to a pc is the reason 360 has better looking games and not all devs put the same effort in for the ps3 versions.. thats where the difference lies. so if anything is wrong with the ps3 .. its lack of dev kits and user friendlyness for devs.

]]> By: Farhan http://www.gamersworldbd.com/2008/06/is-the-gpu-holding-the-ps3-back-short-answer-no.html/comment-page-1#comment-7198 Farhan Thu, 07 May 2009 23:18:01 +0000 http://www.gamersworldbd.com/2008/06/is-the-gpu-holding-the-ps3-back-short-answer-no.html#comment-7198 Who posted that article?as if he never read what a game dveloper sez abt the ps3 graphics power?all game dvelopers say 'we can work confidently with the xbox360 taking advantage of its gpu...but when we have to port it to the ps3 the quality of the game has to be brought down' Who posted that article?as if he never read what a game dveloper sez abt the ps3 graphics power?all game dvelopers say ‘we can work confidently with the xbox360 taking advantage of its gpu…but when we have to port it to the ps3 the quality of the game has to be brought down’

]]> By: Hasan http://www.gamersworldbd.com/2008/06/is-the-gpu-holding-the-ps3-back-short-answer-no.html/comment-page-1#comment-2240 Hasan Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:48:11 +0000 http://www.gamersworldbd.com/2008/06/is-the-gpu-holding-the-ps3-back-short-answer-no.html#comment-2240 @ Gaming Wiz I was kinda talking about PC versions of those console games. @ Gaming Wiz

I was kinda talking about PC versions of those console games.

]]> By: The Gaming Wiz/Mushfiqur Rahman http://www.gamersworldbd.com/2008/06/is-the-gpu-holding-the-ps3-back-short-answer-no.html/comment-page-1#comment-2229 The Gaming Wiz/Mushfiqur Rahman Mon, 04 Aug 2008 05:31:34 +0000 http://www.gamersworldbd.com/2008/06/is-the-gpu-holding-the-ps3-back-short-answer-no.html#comment-2229 @ Hasan In theory it should work. But in reality, you need to have a special emulator (like the Sega emulator) to play the games. And trust me, these softwares are buggy like hell. I tried a PS2 emulator, and of all the games I tried, only one booted up (Burnout Revenge) but it was unplayable. Anyway, don't count on it anytime soon. To make those emulators, you need a proprietary code and you can't have that legally. Besides, game consoles are specially designed for games. You will notice lag even on a similarly configured PC because the software won't be optimized. @ Hasan

In theory it should work. But in reality, you need to have a special emulator (like the Sega emulator) to play the games. And trust me, these softwares are buggy like hell.

I tried a PS2 emulator, and of all the games I tried, only one booted up (Burnout Revenge) but it was unplayable. Anyway, don’t count on it anytime soon. To make those emulators, you need a proprietary code and you can’t have that legally.

Besides, game consoles are specially designed for games. You will notice lag even on a similarly configured PC because the software won’t be optimized.

]]> By: Hasan http://www.gamersworldbd.com/2008/06/is-the-gpu-holding-the-ps3-back-short-answer-no.html/comment-page-1#comment-2201 Hasan Sat, 02 Aug 2008 06:58:21 +0000 http://www.gamersworldbd.com/2008/06/is-the-gpu-holding-the-ps3-back-short-answer-no.html#comment-2201 I want to know one thing - with what PC configuration I would be able to play all the future XBOX and PS3 Games? I mean, lets say XBOX 360 got 2GHz Processor, 500Mhz GPU and 1GB RAM. Now if I buy a PC with the same configuration ( 2GHz Processor, 500Mhz GPU and 1GB RAM ) will I be able to play all the present and future games to come. If not, then why? Consoles can run games with low Specs? If yes PC of what configuration I should buy compared to XBOX 360 and PS3? Thanks. I want to know one thing – with what PC configuration I would be able to play all the future XBOX and PS3 Games?

I mean, lets say XBOX 360 got 2GHz Processor, 500Mhz GPU and 1GB RAM. Now if I buy a PC with the same configuration ( 2GHz Processor, 500Mhz GPU and 1GB RAM ) will I be able to play all the present and future games to come. If not, then why? Consoles can run games with low Specs?

If yes PC of what configuration I should buy compared to XBOX 360 and PS3? Thanks.

]]>